• pmlarsonmiller

    To illustrate my point of supply/demand vs exclusion and greed: 
    When in New Orleans on a trip for educational purposes, we went on a tour. Our guide mentioned that there is a large homeless population within the city, and that many of them often congregate underneath central overpasses of the highways. During sporting events that bring in huge numbers of tourists, the city will house the homeless to hide them from the visitors. If they can do it for two weeks, why not just do it???? With shelter, people would not have to worry about finding a safe place to sleep or staying out of trouble for “loitering.” They could put efforts elsewhere, such as identifying social services. (I will note that it should not be the sole responsibility of a homeless individual to find services, as it is the society as a whole that is responsible for the hierarchical categories that people fall within)

  • pmlarsonmiller

    I am not sure about Chicago, But regarding the Twin Cities, I feel like there would be enough shelter to house most everyone if the epidemic of foreclosure was not pushing people out of their homes. If things were governed simply based on supply and demand, versus exclusion and greed, the homeless population would plummet. Unfortunately, everything is based on political and economic underpinnings of the socioeconomic and racial hierarchies. It is quite simply inhumane and damn disgusting. Provide people with zero options due to their oppressed status within the hierarchy, add in the fanciful desires of the upper class to come and go from inner city to suburb to inner city as they please, and the result is a housing crisis and a population characterized by homelessness and poverty. Like that makes sense…. I don’t know too much about housing, but this is my general understanding. I will definitely read into it further.

  • pmlarsonmiller

    I am not sure about Chicago, But regarding the Twin Cities, I feel like there would be enough shelter to house most everyone if the epidemic of foreclosure was not pushing people out of their homes. If things were governed simply based on supply and demand, versus need and greed, the homeless population would plummet. Unfortunately, everything is based on political and economic underpinnings of the socioeconomic and racial hierarchies. It is quite simply inhumane and damn disgusting. Provide people with zero options due to their oppressed status within the hierarchy, add in the fanciful desires of the upper class to come and go from inner city to suburb to inner city as they please, and the result is a housing crisis and a population characterized by homelessness and poverty. Like that makes sense…. I don’t know too much about housing, but this is my general understanding. I will definitely read into it further. 

  • Of course, there is a direct connection between the demolition of public housing projects and the rise of homelessness..
     
    In Chicago alone, more than 43,000 units — home to more than 100,000 — were destroyed and replaced by less than 10,000 units of “mixed income” housing.
     
    In the meantime, real estate developments made more than $$$$ 1 billion in sales of the Chicago properties where the projects once stood..